>>4397137>>4397657People like you are impossible to empathize with. Whenever I see people talking about "real photographic tools vs soulless computers" and shutter sounds, my mind goes straight to the universally autistic faggots that think CDs were real music and .mp3s are fake soulless music.
Besides "looks old" what is exactly the difference between moving wheels to change aperture, ISO, and shutter speed, and moving wheels to change aperture, ISO, and shutter speed? How the fuck does a less accessible wheel locked to full stops make for an improvement, unless you're just a hipster who isn't so much in to the output of cameras as he is in to playing dress up with 70s-esque fashion?
Canon could make a featherweight, ultra compact full frame camera and you'd call it a soulless computer instead of a real photographic tool for real creative photographers with real souls like you because it didn't have the AE1s controls.
I also notice this phenomenon was formerly limited to the do-nothing children of the rich in the 20th century and early 21st, and only recently expanded to the do-nothing childless pseudo-rich who made $30k off crypto scams/meme stocks and have a WFH web dev job.
>>4397198Yeah, those guys. They always have a fountain pen and a shitty mechanical watch too. ALWAYS. No exceptions. What the fuck is it with these people? It's like they wish they were their grandpa. Is it how they compensate for low skill/low accomplishment?
>Well, I have SUPREME taste for real gentlemen such as myself. You are a sheeple NPC normie who isn't capable of abstract thought or emotions if you dont get how this retro styled consumer product STIRS THE SOUL. Something about japanese wisdom, its a link to the past. Retro game reference! *soiface*They are never, ever about what they make, they are always most obsessed with the process of making it being as quirky and retro as possible.
