>>4034850It's the same negative size as super 35 motion picture film. Do you truly need more?
>>4035199This
>>4034864picrel is 110, which is a lot smaller.
With smol negative sizes you have to be careful not to overexpose, because it kills a ton of detail really quickly (although maybe you could pull in development to save it). You want the thinnest possible negative that has your shadows, and not more.
Shooting slow film with finer grain also helps, ofc.
