>>4329448>What did you do to make it look bettercurves
For what it's worth I don't like the greens even after correction, they're kind of washed out and lack hue detail. That's the sort of thing you can't easily correct for and why I suspect exposure or dev problems.
>>4329522You can scan properly to capture maximum detail sure, but then you'll have a digital negative. Converting that to a usable (positive) image is not a right or wrong process. The "correct" way is through RA-4 prints which includes color adjustments that are up to the discretion of the tech doing the printing.