>>3515300Fuji went in and patched some of their older camera's firmware to allow electronic shutter after the fact. I don't see why it matters who had it first. It's a feature the A6000 lacks, which is the camera we're discussing.
Fuji's lenses aren't "worse" than Sony's. I don't see how you're measuring this, because Sigma's ones are f1.4 and Fuji's affordable lenses are f2? That doesn't mean Fuji is worse. They're often as sharp or sharper in most tests. And the f2 lenses are about on par with Sigma cost wise if you get them from grey market/white box like I do.
Full disclosure, my kit for a long time was the Sony A6000 + Sigma 30mm f1.4. I sold that and replaced it with a used Fuji X-T2 + 35mm f2 with the money. I prefer that combination to the A6000 and Sigma. Just because something is memed the loudest doesn't mean it's the best. Everyone has different needs and Fuji fit mine better than Sony.
Pic related, my Sony A6000 and Sigma before I boxed them up and posted them. I used the Fuji 27mm f2.8 until my 35mm showed up since I managed to get it for £100 from eGlobal and sold it on ebay at a profit.
