>>3015500to me it looks underexposed, obviously
but also
it looks scanned on a really poor quality scanner.
there should be much more detail in the sky. search for 35mm on flickr and compare with this scan. 35mm can do much better.
if you want you can take a shot you like off this roll and then go to a photographer who can scan them for you to test it out.
or look into macro scanning if you have the gear.
