>>3426557>not discussion of set lighting techniques, or even artistic directions, i don't see how you are more capable of "appreciating art" more than those tv plebslol, you're full of empty selfrighteousness. Point me one (1) post on /p/ that discuses lighting techniques for photography. Photography is photography. As long as this stays contained in one thread, I've nothing against it. If you want to be bitchy about anything, go and complain over excess of pointless gearthreads here, and lack of any criticism anyone is giving.
