>>4252295>>4252306>Olympus did it all firstKek yeah there's a reason when new people ask for good cheap camera recs the list I give starts out with "Oly OM-D E-M5 III, E-M1 II, E-M1 III" and then a couple cheaper fujis, nikon DSLRs, and older used MILCs. Olympus just made a bunch of good, cheap cameras for hobbyists that want photos that their phone can't take. Take it from someone who actually takes photos to take photos and not test camera settings.
The G9II seems to be a continuation of the trend of panasonic releasing mediocre cameras too late and chartposting shills having a field day based on wrong math based on wrong statistics + imagining what it would be like to actually own a camera (someday little shill man) + generic shitposting. If this is a paid advertising campaign I feel bad for panasonic. Why would anyone buy something shilled by a schizophrenic kpop fan who is so desperate for attention he makes 6 different threads just to post 0 photos and a bunch of charts?
Posting a photo in ur'e photoless gear thread. I bet you can't measure up to this glorious feat of "picking up your camera once in a while".
