>>3165850high key implies little to no shadows. you won't be able to achieve a high key look without lots of flashes or a mix of natural and artificial light coming in from many directions.
>>3165855why do you think this is a good image
>>3165904i see what you're going for here but its underexposed, noisy, and the comp is eh
>>3165916lamp posts arent interesting and the background is very distracting
>>3165917a 1:1 crop would suit this better and so would darkening your background
>>3165949facebook/instagram tier. if this was a series maybe the idea you're trying to convey would be more apparent
>>3165954too much garbage to distract the viewer from the subject
>>3165965boring comp. blown out highlights in back. doesnt really make me feel anything
>>3165966this one is good. amazing color harmony. nice soft gradient. the water splash adds a nice touch of dynamic. only thing i would do is clone out that little black pebble in bottom left
>>3165967good potential but execution doesnt draw the viewer in that well
>>3165968this would work well in a series
>>3165969crooked. boring light. good comp
>>3165970if you wouldve stayed there longer i feel like you couldve gotten a more interesting cloud formation.
>>3165971good but overdone
>>3165972good
>>3166031i like the isolation, you use a flash? i would crop in closer
>>3166044image is too split up
>>3166060this would work better if you framed it better and added a vignette. saturated the oranges a bit more and added some contrast and clarity
