>>3782682Precisely, "who took it". You get shitty photos that are praised because the ones taken before by the same guy made him famous enough for people to pay for whatever he puts out. After someone makes it in the art world, his stuff is put on a pedestal and even the unremarkable is praised. First it's taken as part of something and mostly ignored, then it's praised on its own with the only context making it seemingly deserving of praise being the artist's name next to it.
