>>4190324>Yo fair points lads, though heres an idea. What if the dials we use for speed apeture and the like werent infininte but instead had limited range that corresponded to the values eith a at the end? It could free up a dial or two and get the best of both worlds.It would limit the usability, the entire point is you don't have to look at the dial itself. You look at the display in the viewfinder or on top of the camera instead. It's less advantageous if you have to use the back screen but still workable.
>Also unrelated but why is the x100v so hyped on tiktok?Fashion victims
>>4190365For me the best thing about aperture rings is that it makes adapting a breeze. Shooting Nikon G lenses on EF is... not great. I have an adapter that actuates the aperture mechanism but there's no detents. Luckily most of my Nikon F lenses aren't G type. I don't think it's such a good feature on modern control by wire models, same with focus by wire too. It locks you in.
RIP Ted, he warned us.
