Here's the EM1 shot of the same pole. Lighting is a bit different today, and the lens I was able to get is a bit shorter, but it's immediately apparent to me that it's a hell of a lot sharper. However, there is significantly more noise in the sky at 200ISO than the Df, which is disappointing.
Fortunately this is only a rental after having learned my lesson with buying before trying. Which means I have about $2500 in store credit to spend on other gear if I end up not wanting this EM1.
>>3596991>And how on earth did you manage to underexpose those images so badlyI just suck at full manual with an OVF.
