>>3651345>takes the obvious meme post seriously>makes the same argument as the meme post>I just don't advocate acting as though shooting film doesn't have a very real expenditure attached to it.Of course it doesn't, it's just not much of a significant expenditure in my opinion to complain about especially when shooting 35mm/developing/scanning at home.
Anyway do you really think
>>3651253 gives a shit about any of this? Of course not that post was 100% to rustle jimmies hence why calling them out for being a non-photo posting faggot with the mentality of a poorfag is the only appropriate thing to do. (Or just ignoring them, but calling them out is more fun).
It's the same energy as those faggots who reply to a fuck load of photos in a photo thread and just say "shit", It's just a non-critique, zero substance and a shitty excuse for a contribution to this board.
