>>3384273>>3384168didn't scan it myself. Was done by a photo store. I do have my own scanner at home but it's unfortunately worse than the one at this store. This one did turn out odd though. I post in these threads a lot though, and this is the first time anyone has said anything negative about my scans.
How's this one for comparison? This one is on Fujifilm Superia Xtra 400 on the same scanner.
