/p/ - Photography » Searching for posts with the image hash ‘4V5ztUuiOud4SZr4arzr7w==’.

Archives: [ bant / c / con / e / i / n / news / out / p / pw / qst / toy / vip / vp / vt / w / wg / wsr ] Boards: [ meta ]

Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.

Searching for posts with the image hash ‘4V5ztUuiOud4SZr4arzr7w==’. 2 results found.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 400mp C200 Scan vs 5Ds 2.jpg, 818KiB, 3074x1996

Anonymous Wed 06 Nov 2024 22:29:13 No.4382301 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>4382298
>Yes 4x5 is diffraction limited a f5.6
>FILM WOULD BE BETTER IF IT WASN'T FOR DIFFRACTION REEEEEE
Oh holy shit, I can't let this one go. You think the diffraction limits for mft apply to fucking 4x5. You don't understand shit about aperture or diffraction. Just more nophoto ignorance. Diffraction does not impact any format more than another for the same fov and dof.

Here's your magical floating cobweb.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 400mp C200 Scan vs 5Ds 2.jpg, 818KiB, 3074x1996

Anonymous Thu 10 Oct 2024 20:17:24 No.4371971 View View Report

Quoted By:

>>4371601
>oh no no no no no!!!

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Searching for posts with the image hash ‘4V5ztUuiOud4SZr4arzr7w==’. 2 results found.

On these archives

Your latest searches