>>4392758He is heavier on form which it think is adequate. People think so much about content but they forget that art IS aesthetics. Or there is no art without aesthetics. You comparing these highly stylistic images with stock photography is baffling. Show me a single stock photographer with this much coherent style. Show me a single photographer who was doing this style before him. His influence is everywhere. You can see it on instagram everywhere.
If you want "content" then you have to look at it within the context of time in which it was published. He was a part of exhibition called New Topographics "Man altered landscape". These were all new constructions and when a modern man see a landscape he doesn't see a landscape untouched by man. What he see is this
>>4392707 (You) flat concrete constructions rather than nature. Walls, corners, door and windows are the View. With interior shots he is turning the idea of landscape photography on its head and photographing the interior like its a landscape. These are cold unhuman spaces of modernity. This is the new ugly landscape, both outdoor and indoor, made by man. This is the new landscape.
I am not american so I don't understand the other subtle bits of information. But art is HOW you say something not what you say because everything is has already been said before. It is a matter of style really.
