>>3885368Another test photo. Was mainly interested in the bokeh. Is it just me or is it warped in a big circle around the frame?
Also this wasn't the point of the test but holy hell that statue is not sharp.
>>3885370It said 200 on the lens itself and says 200 on the exif. I took several photos, from the same spot too. I guess there's just no real standard for what "200" means when it comes to the final composition. One lens' 200mm may just be closer than another's. Or maybe I fucked something up, or something is wrong with one of the lenses. Couldn't tell ya.
