>>4098718Looks like you could just stop coping and admit your assumptions are wrong, but you won't because bad faith arguing is too ingrained in your deplorable psyche. This was a split second before the other pic and an obvious throwaway.
>>4098715>choice of compositionYou don't get what snapping with no rhyme or reason means, do you? Winogrand just pointed his camera at stuff.
>the choice of which pictures to drop and which ones to keep mattersThe curator of a gallery isn't an artist, merely a picker. Same with the photographer who mindlessly snaps a bunch of stuff and then picks some and discards some.
>chance mattersSpray enough and you negate chance. Winogrand himself argued in favor of this. Given enough shots you're bound to get that one fluke no matter what.
>pure chance can create artNo, it can create aesthetic moments but art is human.
>because art is the recognition of something as art by artist and recipientPostmodern bullshit to pass non-art as art.
>you're just dull and somewhat autistic, as i said.lol, cope more. Brainwashed drone.
