>>3351700Don't you thinking you're trying a bit too hard with this critiques? I mean, not everyone is a pro, I don't understand why you even expected
>>3351628 to be as perfect as you said. You don't critique someone who paints as a hobby by telling him that he didn't paint like a master of the art, so why would you expect someone who posts on /p/ with a fucking Nikon d60 to pull off what you wrote?
