>>4373160Not him but, ok, but someone who actually knew what he was doing and didn't scan at like, 3000 dpi got `80mp out of 6x7, so i don't care. Eyes don't lie. 6x7 actually distinguished lines slightly better when the 80mp MFDB was clearly generating aliasing and outdid it in the other parts of the slide test.
Therefore, anyone claiming lower figures was not scanning or shooting as well as they could have, or is a delusional retard.
Maybe instead of focusing on being wrong, focus on where film actually fails, ie: shadow DR. Film has none.
Film has 80mp if something is not black. Film has 80mp if it's not a color that blocks up and sends negroes to the shadow realm. Film has 80mp if your lens does. Focus on what film actually does poorly instead of being a delusional tard and trying to deny the reality in front of your eyes.
6x7 resolves detail at least as well as an 80mp camera. Depending on contrast and exposure, especially with slide film, which has the least dynamic range out of any kind of film.
