>>4468283>Core audience of m43 lunaticsLess than 1% of the market? A dying minority as more and more accept that the a7c is a good camera or some fuji is better?
We have this guy who sounds like an ex-mu-43 goon readily admitting that there's no major IQ or usability upgrade between the em-5 II and om5
>>4467960Olympus is cooked
Their only way to live after they're done milking this doomed from day one digital shit is to restart a film camera production line. The OM-1n and OM-2n can not be too difficult to produce. They're dead simple SLRs designed around the manufacturing capabilities of a japanese warehouse full of 40s and 50s level tech. All of the lenses are already designed as well and making them to the same standard would be cheap as chips. That's basically what china does with ttartisan etc. And because film shooters are idiots and a low volume market, they could just make them exactly like they did before, for the same price adjusted for inflation, and charge $1500 for a metal box. And actually sell a ton. What's the competition? $6000 leica and $800 pentax fixed lens half frame.
