>>4341948>color accuracyOh so you misread. What I said is it is always possible to get exactly the color that is recorded on the negative film. The reason why there are "interpretations" is that scanners either use presets that need updating as film generations change ( gb 200-7, 200-8), which is now impossible due to how old all that shit is, or basically do autolevels, which is not and cannot be perfect, thatbis whybyou have to adjust the levels manually
>and you can't even be bothered to Google search itNah, I want you to present your methodology
>that's sometimes true but not alwaysAlways. Period. I tried comparing on several dozen photos, I always do a way, way better job, IF there's enough information in the file.
>But it's also irrelevantYes it is relevant. There's info cut off in the highlights of the red channel (hence the issues with lips), white and black points are all over the place, and tge contrast is not the same between the channels.
