>>4387300>low IQ slavaboo doesn't understand how moire worksThose weird artefacts are because one it's a low resolution camera shooting a line chart. Google moire.
Two, because of differences in AA filter design changing the moire pattern.
Raw is no corrections except lens compensation, "Jpeg" is ACR's default which bakes in sharpening, luma smoothing, and chroma smoothing which takes care of some moire but not all.
>>4387301No, they don't, actually. You're confusing BRIGHTNESS with SAMPLE SIZE. This is because your IQ is in the double digits and you have an olympanon tier understanding of imaging (yeah, the guy who insisted micro four thirds had more intense light and was better than full frame, and took the worst photos ever seen outside of /phone/).
If you put different sized 20mp (and identical tech) sensors with fixed standard sensitivity and a fixed speed shutter in front of the same 50mm f2 lens, the photos will all be the same BRIGHTNESS, with FOV changing only and being compensated for with subject distance.
But the smaller sensors have an inferior SAMPLE SIZE which increases photon shot noise
If you put a 25mm f2 on mft and a 50mm f2 on full frame they will have the same exposure at ISO 100, 1/125. The MFT will be noisier from its inferior sample size. The FF will have less DOF because the lens is longer and needs a physically larger aperture. But how does the 25mm f2 get as much light intensity with a smaller aperture? Wider angle lenses suck in just as much light overall at the same aperture to focal length ratio (aka fstop). Longer lenses suck in more light from a narrower/more distant area but get the same BRIGHTNESS at the same FSTOP. Always.
