>>4367077>I swear to god man you've had this argument at least once a day with 5 different peopleStop lying and exaggerating and post photos or links to photos, even if they're from someone else. Let's see it. Let's see 6x7 beating 45-61mp FF or 50mp Fuji GFX. And remember: you started this. All I did was make an innocent comment, and you had to be a gear queer. Don't cry now that you got your ass beat.
>pls uploadYou first. It's that simple. You don't get to make any demands when you have posted NOTHING.
>I will personally be comparing it to the next lower resolution scan because over-scanning (resolving grain) to that degree ironically looks worseI tend to agree. Here's the drum scan. Film looks a little better than in the 10,000 ppi scan, but the 5Ds still wins this with ease. Film is still softer and still shows some grain. Looking at surfaces you see the structure of film showing through. Looking at surfaces in the 5Ds shot, it just looks like reality. Same thing we see in the portraits. This directly contradicts filmfag claims regarding resolution AND color detail/separation. "Muh Bayer!!!" has no trouble with the most subtle color transitions and details, while film turns to grain.
