>>4446603nothing bad. well exposed, in focus, composed fairly. i could nitpick and say you could do more photoshop work to remove the bit at the top of the pole and that ?dust? to the left of the frame. i could see this being a movie poster for some ameature film where the girl's teddy makes a journey back home after being left at the park
>>4446604650 & 706 are right, no subject. pointless photo
>>4446605did you miss focus? it just seems blurry. the nose bridge seems more infocus than the eye. Even if it was in focus, it would just be a boring dog photo. not my style
>>4446606this one is a nice capture. great mood, action, good light, solid. I wonder what it would look like if you took the shot from a head higher/lower? My only real critique is the guys cap covers alot and is distracting
>>4446608not a fan. the bird isnt doing enough to stand out. its a distracting background that doesnt compliment the subject well. The bald spots offer a lot to pull your eyes away. or wondering if the branches on the bottom are really long or if there's water making a reflection(is it water? its not right?). If you took the shot like 0.1 seconds later with the bird covering the bald spot on the right i think would be nicer. Add a bit of a crop to it, now we're talking. much better imo.
and yeah just a smidge of sharpness would be nice too
>final advice:>STAY ALERT>DO YOUR WORK>DON’T WORRY ABOUT THE WORLD GOING BY>GET YOUR BUTT IN GEAR and DO IT>and DON’T TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWERAMEN!
