>>3771829>This is all literally the result of sharpENING and tone mapping bullshit. Not optical sharpness.lel no, it's the result of extreme resolution
>Post what you think is a ruined "sharp" photo. I bet it's full of halos and other faggotry and local contrast "enhanced" pores and all that crap. I guarantee you're not gonna post an image that was taken with a sharp lens but hasn't been "enhanced". Probably just shit from a soft $500 zoom lens with distortion corrections and all the works done through software.The software added the hairs in her nose? The wrinkles on her face?
You'll never make it as a portrait photographer, lol
