>>3667696I am not the same person. I am
>>3667692>>3667686Go to DXOmark, and check out some pretty regular lenses and you will see that a lot of high res bodies are capped by their lenses. If you put that same lens on an APSC camera you will see that the effective resolution is even less. Thereby illustrating what
>>3667681 intended
Just an example is pic related, it is not even a very sharp lens.
As a headsup, a 1P-MPix is not noticable difference in sharpness.
The D7100 is 24.1MP (and 5 years newer)
The D700 is 12MP.
As you can see, the dramatic increase in resolution barely resolves more in practice because the lens is fairly soft. Even going to a 36MP D800 you would only get the marginal increase to 15 PMpix.
Lenses have a far greater impact that you expect, and what
>>3667682 is false, your image might have a higher resolution, but your effective resolution is lower. You just cannot resolve the detail that your sensor would have with a sharper lens.
