>>4034811>Thanks you for the quick review on the system. The top 4 lenses seems pretty great, except for how dark the 11-22mm is. EF-M lives! [spoiler:lit]Would I be too optimistic to expect new M lenses from canon?Canon has devoted EVERYTHING to getting the R-system off the ground. But yes, I think future lenses are possible.
I used to be a licensed Canon dealer years ago (retail) so my impressions might be tainted slightly from knowing how they used to operate. They do make mistakes from time to time but the EOS M was their attempt to test the waters for mirrorless reception. It wasn't until they developed DPAF sensors that the M-System became truly viable and the patents for the DPAF sensors were originally filed with the M in mind. The shot of a Roman looking bust was taken handheld in an Art Museum but I regret not having the 22mm f/2 or 32mm f/1.4 lens on hand at the time (my fault).
Those 4 lenses I mentioned are the ones I found to be the sharpest. The 22mm f/2 is amazing value and when on sale it has sold for as little as US $99 ! The EF-M 11-22mm lens is really sharp. There's nothing like it, even in the EF and RF range. The color rendition and corner-to-corner sharpness is really L-series in terms of optical performance. It's so lightweight I'll often clip it (with M6 camera body) to my shoulder when hiking. For low light, yes... it's dim at f/4 but I've taken pictures from inside my car at night when exiting a carpark and the clarity was surprisingly good. Much better than I expected. I can use it for twilight shots as well whilst handheld. But on a tripod for night shots or handheld for daylight shots, it's worth its weight in gold.
* These are some JPEGs shot with the EF-M 11-22mm lens on both the original EOS M (2012) and the more recent EOS M6 camera. Two of the images were taken at 22mm and the rest were at 11mm (ultra wide).
It's been a good lens to me and I know a lot of vocal photographers on the forum are particularly fond of it.
