>>3163026> What happens to these arguments when we compare printsDunno. Even with people still shooting film, though, scanning and printing digitally is how most people make prints these days.
And, yet again: How sharply a photo's smallest details are rendered is never going to be the difference between a good and bad photo.
> Also, under edge conditions digital sensors' output degrades to the kind of oil-paint mushYeah, but digital hits its "edge conditions" far beyond the point where film has given up entirely. I consider ISO 3200 to still be in the "low ISO" range on my 5D Mark III, but that's the fastest film you can buy and ISO 3200 films have grain as big as your head. Plus, you leave color behind way back at ISO 800. At ISO 800, I hardly even see any shadow noise on my camera in 100% crops.
