>>3535998Lmao, you couldn't even explain your rebuttal, let alone support it. Pic related tho.
>>3535999Pixel pitch is how big each light gathering site is sweetie. If mft and ff have tge same megapixel count, the photosites on ff will be slightly larger than 4 times the size of those on mft (mft loses a bit extra due to the interpixel distance being constant between the 2), being 4 times as large, it gathers 4 times as much light and the lens attached only needs to be able to resolve 1/4 as much detail to have equivalent sharpness images.
This is basic physics even a dullard could picture in his head.
>>3536023The t value of a lens is how much light it puts through per sq area, not how much in total it projects onto the sensor.
3 messages in a row proving your stupidity... Oof, go to bed.
>>3536062Yes, the sony not only has larger pixels, it also has way over double the pixels of the oly. So for the same pixel that ends up in a finished photo, sony is using around 4 times as much pixel area.
>lenses already outresolve sensorsThen how come there is still a discrepancy in sharpness amongst the most expensive, best performing lenses in the world? Even on 24mp ff sensors? And why do mft shots never have the crispness of ff?
You're an idiot.
