>>4118998>>4118994>I never said different gen camerasWhat were you talking about with the 5dii and a7iv then, implying that there was more than 1 gen.
And you were well off, at base iso there's not 1 stop difference between them, there's 2.5 stops. Which is about 6 times wider range captured by the Sony. Lol.
>Look at these photos that are at completely different exposure levelsLol, you're an idiot.
>But opThen stop arguing with me if this is so important to you? As I said, preventing the dissemination of misinformation is always important for any community.
>1 ev difference in pushing shadows is irrelevant, how dare you show that a 1ev worse DR camera is worse at pushing shadowsLol.
And it's not a tiny difference, it's 1 stop, or twice\half as much. If you've ever been bothered by noise in raised shadows then it is relevant.
>I can't debate your graphI know
>No you can't say you use science to aid in your photosIt's actually a 2 way street, I see image quality issues in photos, I find out the reasons why and then I apply that knowledge to my photo taking. :)
>You don't understand the scienceTell that to my degree, lol.
>Which it does notExcept it does, from sensors of the same generation, which I've repeatedly included.
>But the canon doesn't follow the same pattern as sensors from later generationsSee above. Lol.
>But not worse high isoExcept it did still lose, and again, different generations. The canon suffers more at low iso as it's older gen. Pic related, the older gen followed the same shape.
