>>3041996I get what you were going for and this is a cool idea, however I think it would have worked better if the palm tree was framed better. For something like this I think it's important to shoot a bit wider and then in post get the exact cropping you want to make it work. And desu shooting a bit wider and cropping later is generally a pretty good idea, mostly when you have a 20 MP camera only to output 1 MP results.
>1/6400 sec>ISO 3200there's no way that can be right, no one is retarded enough to shoot with those settings and it doesn't look like ISO 3200 anyway
>>3042063crop aggressively, it will make your windmill bigger and therefore the shot more interesting, something like this
>>3042111overly distracting background, subject is nice but tiny in the frame, face needs at least a bit of fill flash to make up for the lighting situation.
>>3042165>gibsmedats moneycrop
>>3042177>>3042180I was pretty surprised to see a picture of tree leaves with an ACTUAL SUBJECT in them, having a real subject is getting rare around here
>>3042181also cool, you get the conic monolith and the godly rays of light in the back
>>3042202meh, not sure B&W improved it
>>3042347I'm not sure what I'm looking at, there's a slight disproportion in terms of area between the action and the nothing around it. Crop maybe?
>>3042366not too bad, a bit too much DOF maybe
>>3042429>>3042431it's a bit creepy m8
>>3042496not too bad
