>>3354193>because no one is going to steal your shit photos anyway.I've already had my photos stolen. That's why I'm trying to develop a watermark that prevents printing. I don't care about advertisement through a watermark, I have that covered already.
>>3354192I haven't been moving the bar at all, just offering challenges. Some of these marks are a lot stronger than others, and the ones you've chosen to swing at show me what the easiest techniques are to avoid.
Thanks to you I've settled on what works best. Pic the easiest spot on this one and see what you can do.
