>>3061635Hey OP,
There is one of three things happening to you.
> 1) You are incompetent.Unlikely (even the worst photographer will still hit something nice every now and then), but still possible.
You could have a setting wrong somewhere, a photo shooting mode or a lightroom setting (I had mine set to zoom to 300% and not 100% on click, made everything look like shit), but I assume you have gone through everything one by one to make sure this is not the case.
> 2) Your body is fucked.Unlikely, the a6000 is a pretty solid body. I guess you could have gotten a fucked one buying refurb, and it is weird for the issue to be "It makes photos blurry" and have it actually be the body, but I guess it is possible.
> 3) Your lens is shit.The 16-50 is shit at everything other than being acceptable image quality while being extremely compact. It is decently sharp in the middle, but the corners suck. The aperture also sucks so it doesn't work all that great in limited lighting situations. It gets a lot of shit for being used by many when it released on camera bodies without lens profiles for it. It is SO FUCKING BAD without a profile, but acceptable with. The easiest way to test this is to use a known good lens. You can adapt pretty much any lens for $20, so this should be easy to check.
As for which body to get? I'd say the a7ii, a good ~50mm prime (Zeiss 55mm comes to mind) and you will be able to take some pretty nice shots, especially in low light. Though it may be a good idea to wait a week or two, a7iii is supposed to be right around the corner.
Get the a6500 if you need every edge you can get when it comes to autofocus, but honestly the a7ii is more than good enough for most situations. Plus there is a lot of great FF e-mount lenses out now.
