>>3421288Everything is "Ok" I'm not sure if B&W improved your pics. If it didn't, leave the color. Nepal is to most of the IG audience "Exotic" and you've taken some pictures of it, but the individual photos and the feed in general don't tell anything about Nepal. There is no story in your shots.
>>3420921Taking a photo of the back of someone is almost never a good idea. All your shots look like you were a tourist somewhere and thought "Oh, this is pretty" and took a snap. Read books and/or watch more tutorials on comp, color, and editing.
>>3420860Like above, this looks like tourist photography. Photos of people are typically more interesting than photos of things. Like the dude above said, the colors are nice.
>>3420838Like 2 of the shots are pretty good, but stop with the PS. Double exposure is like hiring a hooker in Thailand. If you do it right, it's a fun thing and a good story. More than likely it's going to be a travesty.
>>3420759Looks like you could get an A in a HS photography class, but there is nothing there that would make me want to look at your photos more than once.
>>3419927I like most of these for what they are, but street photography isn't really my bag.
>>3419181I didn't see a single shot that interested me. Technical skills I guess are maybe Ok? But the spaghetti you got at a shitty diner isn't very interesting at all. Neither is the car parked in front of your hotel.
>>3419162Ok, but like I said to people above, a pretty plant or landscape is fine for a backdrop but it really doesn't speak. Adding a human element or some sort of story would help.
>>3419100Your folders are much better than your feed. People browsing won't want to click on them and assume your photography is just more shitty snaps of you looking bored on vacation.
Anyhow, I just started a IG for photography and not family shit.
https://www.instagram.com/s_prime_photography/CC, need to build folowers, bla bla bla
