>>4110539>there is little use of such shallow DoF ouside of headshotsnaah, there's plenty of times you want to pick someone's whole body out of a crowd or you want to remove the bg as much as you can
>>4110544I think the bruh is that ISO 1–400 indoors is very low and that going to say 1600 in exchange for f/2.8 is an obvious trade.
>>4110569There's no one correct aperture in any situation. Try practising on chairs and other stuff around your home. Put one about where you would take a picture of someone and place it slightly off perpendicular (so not facing you exactly dead on) and figure out how much of it ends up acceptably in focus at what apertures.