>>3245550>I've discovered that there aren't that many places where you can see the houses lined up this way for a shot.Amen. Cars are another big problem unless you're willing to get up at stupid in the morning.
>Been here much?Just once. I got a shout at the last minute and spent 3 nights there earlier last month. Great place, feels a lot like Edinburgh which is my back yard. Wish I'd had time and weather/season to get more than the tourist trap shots but c'est la vie
>>3245553>Also... any advice on the Amsterdam snaps?Your shots seem to be you testing things out so I didn't have any to offer
>>3245053Is underexposed in the sky and obviously anything other than the windows and you need a foreground or an interesting sky here.
>>3245057Seems to be you testing panning out because otherwise the background is uninteresting and you're too high. Get lower and shoot against the buildings and you make this a more worthwhile shot
>>3245067The background is fantastic but the elements in the foreground, while they look interesting, feel busy and unwanted damaging the shot
>>3245073Again, get lower and give it something of interest in the foreground, perhaps a motion blurred cyclist.
>>3245091The shot I like most of the lot because it's saying something and has purpose. Foreground feels a little busy or perhaps out of focus and the colours are ultimately bland besides the bricks but it's a good shot. Again, you could benefit from being lower.
>>3245567This one works too but wait until you're about to get run over and/or let the tram make the foreground and you give the shot movement and impact rather than the people being the topic/subject
>>3245594That's a beauty of a shot but you need a lot more of that glassy blue water at the bottom, even at the cost of cropping that branch at the top down to the top of the mountain, depending on your format
Beautiful work on those whites and yellows. I'd suggest the foreground have more contrast
