>>3744457>what do the models thinkI get a lot of mixed reactions, which I've detailed before. The short version is that some people become upset, others find it intriguing, and many seem disinterested, in that they won't come back again and cease contact; my process is a cheap trick. Over time the ratio of people who are happy with the results to those that are unhappy has improved, as the increasing sample size of examples cements a better impression of what to expect in the minds of prospective models, and thus exerts a subtle effect of self-selection. Though I've had complaints of my shot making people look ugly many times before, I have to say, there are a few of these where I think people look very attractive.
>>3741164 ,
>>3741163 , >>3740951 , are all models that I think I did justice, from a more conventional perspective of vanity. An interesting detail is that two of my models have been non-binary, and both times, they seemed quite appreciative of how they believed I had managed to depict them in a way that enhanced or emphasized their androgyny. This hadn't been my intention, however I'm always happy with any results that make people likely to return. >>3744126What's with the Deleuzian vocabulary here?
