>>4384042>>4384061Please, shut up, canon 5ds larp sperg. You don't own a camera. You think everyone you get into an argument with is the same person. You have been reposting the same poorly shot, out of focus looking maps and awful volleyball snapshit over and over again for 3 months and when asked to post a simple photo of your 5ds you back out instantly. Shocking.
Everyone on /p/ recognizes you easily because you're incapable of hiding it. You think they're all the same person but you've pissed off a dozen people by now.
Anyways, time for facts
Canon, nikon, and yes, sony, are absolutely screwing FF fags out of some of the dynamic range full frame is meant to have. I'm not usually one to complain and like me a 10 stop DR CCD sensor sometimes, and not everyone needs the highest DR camera. But prices range from TWO TO FIVE THOUSAND FUCKING DOLLARS.
This is indefensible behavior from these corporations. I get it, it's probably cheaper for their R&D teams to speed up readout by gathering less light, vs the daunting task of developing entirely new sensor technology, but in what fucking world does corner cutting jive with a FIVE FUCKING THOUSAND DOLLAR camera and why is this gimping becoming the standard? If it's aps-c tier full frame it should be half off.
>>4384056There's more than one person that has discovered the horrors of modern mirrorless anon. It's a plain fact at this point that canon has resorted to employing noise reduction to impress point of sale customers and keep their cameras ranked well in score-based review sites, the majority of which base their scores off immediately apparent noise, rather than deeper dives into real dynamic range capture.
Even dpreview is pointing it out with the R5II and Z6III and they usually shill hot garbage due to being an ad platform owned by amazon
