>>3273027>but the poster said he was looking at bridge cameras too so I assumed this size difference was negligibleHe said the RX10 was likely too big, but I'm not saying that the GX850 would be too big for him. What I'm saying is you're wrong if you think it's the same size as those other options.
>Also, none of those cameras save the rx100 could even remotely be put into a jean pocketDepends how tight the jeans are. If we're talking about trousers with pockets large enough to comfortably fit your hands in then the LX10 and TZ100/200 would also fit.
The GX850 with the kit lens is 12mm thicker than the thickest of those options (TZ100/200) and 15/16mm thicker than the LX10/RX100. Again I'm not saying that's a deal breaker but it's also not the same size (I was exaggerating when I said twice as thick) and it could be enough that it makes sticking it in a pocket awkward enough that you'd just end up wearing it round your neck on a strap.
