>>3067503I could literally do this all day, because I have literally thousands of film scans that are all of roughly equivalent quality.
Pic related I've even gone full honest john on you; no shred of sharpening has sullied this file, not even in the raw conversion, only colour and contrast adjustments. The zoomed out image has been cropped to remove the frame borders. I really can't wait to switch to a legit high-MP, non-AA sensor.
This is Reala, of unknown expiry date, metered at 100 for the darker park of the subject tree, shot with the EF 100mm non-L Macro wide open, with a remote release.
The scan was with an A7 and Canon FD 50/3.5 Macro on the Canon 1:1 extension tube.
>mfw scanning one roll of 35mm at """"6300dpi"""" on an Imacon would probably take more than a dayFrom the "Hasselblad" Flextight X1 spiel on B&H:
>The X1 can blaze along at up to 60MB per minute>up to>when making bloated 16-bit tiff's with a proprietary file extension from interpolated "scan data" 