>>2645585too much HDR or whatever you did. dyel facebook profile pic/10
>>2645588you unable to white balance or what? b+w insta-art much? clichéd snapshit/10. too much boring crap on the right of the frame when the subject is not even remotely that interesting. zoom in/get closer.
>>2645595is the photo of the richness of the wood or the leather and the hairs coming through? shit concept/10 lrn2composition
>>2645613>>2645616delete/10 nothing to see here
>>2645615awful light but 5.5/10 composition tbh so not bad for you. what am I supposed to be looking at here, the person or the 18 wheeler? the picture is nonsensical.
>>2645738read some stuff on composition. even basic bitch stuff like the rule of thirds would have helped this photo.
>>2645742you're fucking retarded.
>>2645404>>2645408>>2645410wow, somebody with some actual promise.
the most interesting part in the first is obviously the people, the rest is filler. in the second, too much negative space to the right. in the third, too literal, cut off everything. if it's abstract don't shoot it like a straight factual architectural shot. pic related.
