>>2955066>In an ideal case, In any case. See below.
>It's even less in terms of actual sharpness since no lens is ideal.Confirmed for not knowing how optics work. The resolution of a system never reaches the resolution of the weakest component. But improving ANY component brings it closer to that resolution. You don't have to have Zeiss Otus lenses to benefit from a 5Dsr. Even merely "good" lenses benefit.
But if you do have the Zeiss the 5Dsr will actually be sharper than a 645z with Pentax glass. Not true with the D810.
>>DxO's "sports" score is based on an analysis of...one pixel>False. Otherwise Nikon's own 16MP pro FF cameras with their much bigger pixels would've had WAY higher "sports" scores than D800.I'm not even sure how to respond to that because if DxO ranks the D4 or D5 lower in high ISO performance than the D810 then it would undermine my claim about their sports test. But it would also prove that DxO is full of fucking idiots and destroy any credibility that they have.
Either way I win.
Any way, pic related. Tell me again which has better high ISO.
>>2955067>Resolution is highly overrated.No, DR is highly overrated. It's all anyone ever talks about, yet it's relevant in maybe 5% of shots. More if you're a landscape guy, but then you're bracketing and doing HDR any time the sun is in the frame any way.
The resolution of either camera is beyond what most need or will use. But if you happen to be one of the people who needs it, the 5Dsr is clearly ahead.