>>3252166>>3252165I'm gonna say top left is film and bottom right is digital. The highlights don't seem as harsh and the colors look more natural, I guess like less contrast but still punchy idk.
>-and is the digital version inherently worse?Assuming that I chose correctly, I wouldn't say its worse. Just two different mediums with subtle (in this case) or extreme differences. The way film handles light and color is desirable to me, but I can't seem to emulate that digitally.
pic unrelated
