>>3014868>if you say "extremely subjective" youre saying "it could be anything". faggot.>a photo can be super untechnical, uncompositional, unwhatever, but if other people not involved in it find value in it, its cant be a snapshit.:^)
>>3014807snapshit.
uncomposed "street" guy leaning on box shallow dof b/w. nothing worthy pressing the shutter button in that frame, no content to take interest in, nothing memorable. same level of involvement as autistic cloud spammer guy here.
>>3014865That's a photo. Meticulously framed and composed, the composition of the elements being the subject, with a definitive characteristic style that lets me recognise your works posted throughout various other threads. Eye catching.
Uploading what I consider a total snapshit.