>>2853274Holy shit, I've never seen anyone be so stupid without having trouble breathing unassisted.
You're missing so many points here I don't know where to start. Yeah, a 5d would be fine at a zoo, but having only a 50mm prime would gargle monkey balls.
The point of that photo is to refute your point that you can't take pictures of fast-moving subjects with an entry-level body and a kit lens, and your claim that a beginner won't be shooting wildlife. The overall quality is totally irrelevant, what's relevant is the entry-level bodies are still competent enough and a beginner will shoot whatever the hell they feel like, because not everyone is a loser like you.
And then you say:
>you gearwhores love to pretend to be doing shit while in reality the camera does all the work.Like I said, I use MF glass for wildlife.
You think you have all the answers but you're just a petulant child. Pony up some shots, bucko. Put your money where your mouth is or stop shitting up the board.
