>>3836475>Dude is claiming that he's getting rolling shutter at shutter higher than 1/4000s. It's near impossible to get it there unless he's shooting plane propellers or having an epileptic shock while operating it.That's not true--the shutter speed itself has nothing to do with it, because (as
>>3836461explained) it's all about the readout speed. If it takes 30ms to read out the sensor, it doesn't matter if those photosites exposed at 1/4000th or 1/40th, you're gonna get rolling shutter.
That being said, I agree that the level of distortion in the op pic looks more like he did it deliberately than like it just did that. I've actually gone out a few times to attempt to use the electronic shutter rolling shutter effect creatively on purpose, and this is the sort of effect I get from moving the camera really fast as I hit the shutter button. If I just use the electronic shutter while holding the camera normally, I don't see anything weird (and have used that on more than one occasion at slower speeds because I was shooting something where even the gentle click of a mirrorless shutter would be louder than I wanted).
