>>3389598As the bread in that (You) sandwich, I'd like to point out that my
>>3389515 post was actually mocking m4/3 (for being just as expensive as APS-C, and sometimes even full frame, despite the significantly smaller sensor).
My post in
>>3389106 wasn't really defending m4/3 so much as it was mocking the dipshit who created this thread for being a dipshit.
Attached is the pic from the third full-frame digital camera I've owned; the one I bought just for funsies because I had an extra thousand dollars laying around and had been having a bad week.
