>>2975144Absolutely, I felt so saddened the day I unfollowed him because I couldn't stand that trash anymore. His landscapes were truly inspiring.
>>2975146Absolutely, it's a great thing to always keep in your mind. You can always take the rule of thirds as literal as you want or use it as a soft guideline. Glad to help.
>>2975147Thanks anon. E100g is an outstanding film, I hope you enjoy using it.
>>2975148The boulder definitely does take up a large part of the frame, but luckily it isn't too bright to stand out from the rest of the frame. I don't really know how, but that has become my best income producing print so I just roll with it now.
>>2975152Absolutely, glad to help.
>>2975154I love you /p/
>>2975158You just described at least 50% of my client demographic.
>>2975164Thanks anon.
>>2975165This guy
>>2975167 said it pretty well. I don't concern myself too much with sharpening as the scans are huge. I just need to get things a bit sharper for larger prints because the flatbed scanner doesn't resolve the best.
>>2975166Definitely, I have changed my standards many times over the years and there are so many photos that I've taken off the website and no longer print. Pic related is one of my older images that just keeps selling.
>>2975171Lots of reasons, but a big part of it comes down to the fact that it works well for me and I'm used to the workflow. I have no need for speed in the landscape business and I don't feel the desire to go the convenient route. I like the look of larger formats (less distortion with wides, depth, etc) and I have no desire to keep up with new gear all the time. I'm also incredibly hard on my equipment and prefer gear that has very little that can go wrong with it. Also when a fat guy walks in my art show booth and barks "CANON OR NIKON?!" I can kindly tell him to fuck off and I don't have to let him have the pleasure of rubbing his brand preference in my face because I just don't care.
