Okay, I guess i'll do some C&C, seeing as that appears to have become an archaic concept here on /p/ and no one really bothers anymore. Honestly, you really do start to realize that photography's proliferation as a medium has reached the ultimate saturation point when you can view entire threads of okay photos and not experience a single critical reply.
Lets see...
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/121660587@N06/Okay, good strong colours, a man after my own heart. Concentrate on your composition - some of these shots seem like opportunities missed, with strange angles and key details cropped. On a couple of occasions you have chosen to take very cliche photographs and even used black and white where it isnt complimentary. Dont be afraid of stitching panoramas either - some of the shots feel like they would have benefited by being wider. Other than that, good shit, keep shooting.
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/valejacoboA key problem with using Flickr is that its tempting to utilize it for both personal and professional portfolio works. I'm guilty of it, as are many others. Your Flickr suffers from it quite severely. You have a decent eye for composition, but you could do with dusting up on your post processing - im seeing a lot of lost shadows and skewed angles. Next !
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/dipluridae/Okay Vosh, theres some nice colour work going on here. Great tones and well spotted geometry. I even see an Eggy emulation. I can tell that you have a passion for photography, and I feel like the next step for you is to start developing a very individual style of photograph. Its all a bit random right now. Also, some of the architectural work hovers between a demonstration of the power of symmetry and a naive attempt at evoking an emotional response - you need to choose which one you are trying to get hombre. Squashing both together is just confusing. Am I supposed to be admiring the architecture? Or finding further meaning in the comp?
