>>4302176bracketed exposures as other anons have mentioned. pic related is for me with a Z7 and 500 f/5.6. technically 1/10th as the minimum shutter speed is wrong as that is for static stars rather than the sun which moves faster. although it is kind of a moot point as im using an electronic shutter and my sensor readout speed is close enough at 1/15
>>4302191lol no, that is a composite. exposures vary greatly. also with horrible editing making the corona orange, nad terrible chromatic abberations
>>4302196considering it has almost all phases, more like 2.5 hours
